RE: Access GUM with Powerloom

Hi Bateman,

   I have gave up to translate GUM into PowerLoom KB. I wanted so much to do 
that but I would like to finish my project as soon as possible. For my 
interest, I might try to do that after my project. It may be disappointing for 
you... as I have no representation to swap with you.... It is so nice to hear 
that there is a revision of GUM to other ontology standards.
   I am a linguistics student in Hong Kong. My project is to use GUM to see 
how experience is construed. Actually, I am just a beginner in Ontology, but i 
found it is very useful and challenging in linguistics. If I have any new idea 
or work out anything interesting, I will definitely share with you.

   PS. It is really a big surprise to receive a message from you.

Best,
Ian

>===== Original Message From John Bateman <bateman <at> uni-bremen.de> =====
>Hi Ian,
>
>I was very interested to read this:
>
>>I am doing a project on Generalized Upper
>>Model.  I would like to ask is it possible to import GUM to PowerLoom?
>>
>In case you would be interested, we are currently engaged in a major
>revision of the GUM, which will include its re-expression in OWL and
>other current ontology standards.
>
>We would also be very interested in seeing your conversion into
>PowerLoom if you get it working. Perhaps we could swap representations?
>
>I also wonder what it is that your project is doing with it. Any info
>would be most welcome.
>
>Best,
>John Bateman.
>
>------------------------------------
>Uni Bremen
>http://www.uni-bremen.de/~bateman