RE: Maximum backup index for RollingFileAppender

It would have been nice if some kind of renaming scheme was used that
was near zero-cost. For example, a date/time stamp...

-----Original Message-----
From: Jostein Tveit [mailto:josteitv <at> pvv.ntnu.no] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 11:42 PM
To: Log4CXX User
Subject: Re: Maximum backup index for RollingFileAppender

"Dale King" <dalewking <at> gmail.com> writes:

> 12 is a hardcoded limit because this requires renames of all backup
> files which is expensive

It would have been nice if log4cxx issued a warning or error
message if the value was set to a value outside the boundaries.

--

-- 
Jostein Tveit <josteitv <at> pvv.ntnu.no>