Re: RFC-333: Unify track/recording guidelines

2011/8/2, Lukáš Lalinský <lalinsky <at> gmail.com>:
> On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 11:03 AM, jesus2099 <hta3s836gzacohe <at> jetable.org>
> wrote:
>> X>>> « 3) Some other editor fixes the recordings, which adds even more
>> work
>> for voters. »
>> J2>> That’s also true when you enter altered titles and then someone with
>> the release has to fix track titles back.
>> PCB> I'm not sure I understand the point.
>>
>> Having unfaithful tracklist to fix is same work load as the opposite that
>> is
>> described in 3) point.
>
> But that is precisely my point, having separate guidelines for titles
> and recordings means it's more difficult to maintain MusicBrainz.

I disagree: As-printed wouldn't require a difficult guideline, while I
am still unsure of the differences between tracks and recordings
following your proposal. Because you although your proposal is titled
"unify track/recordings", they will end up different at some point.

--

-- 
Frederic Da Vitoria
(davitof)

Membre de l'April - « promouvoir et défendre le logiciel libre » -
http://www.april.org

_______________________________________________
MusicBrainz-style mailing list
MusicBrainz-style <at> lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style