Re: Signature Blocks and URI Sign Requests

On Monday, April 02, 2012 4:55:03 PM Alan Reiner wrote:
> Any thoughts?  (I have no doubts that there are :) )

IMO, the sign-request URI should be an extension on the existing bitcoin: URI 
scheme; this way, sigNeeded can be omitted to imply "sign with a sending 
address".

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to
monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second 
resolution app monitoring today. Free.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev