2 Jan 13:38
Command equivalent to left-click
Jim Lesurf <jcgl <at> audiomisc.co.uk>
2010-01-02 12:38:50 GMT
2010-01-02 12:38:50 GMT
I'm currently writing a simple ROX app which is to act as a 'demo' for some people. The task is to be able to search a set of metadata I have and identify which items meet the search keywords, etc. I have a system that works moderately well, but has some snags which I'm sure can be overcome, but I'm too ignorant as yet to solve! The app works on the simple basis of starting an xterm and running the program there so it can ask the user to type in the required keywords, and then report its progress. However the main output is in the form of an HTML file the user then can read and use. This lists detailes of 'found' items, says which CDROM of the set they are on, and gives a URL that will let the browser load them once the appropriate CDROM is mounted. This works. But the process shows one irritating feature. This is because I have (currently) to load the file into a browser by using the C system() proceedure to issue something like 'firefox <filename>'. This has two snags. Firstly it means it has to name the browser, so I then have to have a user changable setting for the command if they are using some other browser. Secondly, the browser process is a child of the main application xterm process. This means that if I close the xterminal window it abruptly also shuts the browser down. It also means that if I use evince to view the PDF files that are on the CDROM, firefox lets me do this OK, but any errors due to the way I've had to tweak evince *not* to open absurdly large windows then pop up in the xterm window! If I click on the HTML file in a filer window then, of course, none of the above occurs. Presumably because the browser process is then a child of the windowing system. Alas, that means the user has to do this instead of having the application get the browser to display the result. So is there a simple command that will ensure the browser view of the resulting file does *not* vanish if the xterminal window is closed, and does *not* pass unwanted moans by evince back up to it? With RO I'd use Filer_Run and that would solve the problem. But I'm trying to get a version that lets me supply people with a ROX version - and ideally one that also works for non ROX linux users who can start the process by clicking AppRun.FWIW I've tried using exec and adding &. Using & allows me to stop the moans by evince from being passed to the xterminal, but doesn't allow the browser to keep running if the xterm is closed. So clearly my ignorance is holding me up. I'm assuming there is a Linux command equivalent to Filer_Run that then use MIME, etc, to determine the action, but that I am clueless as to what it is. This must be possible, surely?... Slainte, Jim -- -- Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scots_Guide/intro/electron.htm Armstrong Audio http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong/armstrong.html Audio Misc http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev
FWIW I've tried using exec and adding &. Using & allows me to stop the
moans by evince from being passed to the xterminal, but doesn't allow the
browser to keep running if the xterm is closed. So clearly my ignorance is
holding me up. I'm assuming there is a Linux command equivalent to
Filer_Run that then use MIME, etc, to determine the action, but that I am
clueless as to what it is. This must be possible, surely?...
Slainte,
Jim
RSS Feed