Re: openpgp fingerprints for subkeys

Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg <at> fifthhorseman.net> writes:

> On Mon 2008-06-16 15:36:03 -0400, Simon Josefsson wrote:
>
>> It looks small and harmless.  I think we should add it before
>> v2.4.0.  Have you signed copyright papers with FSF?  My
>> fencepost.gnu.org account doesn't seem to work so I can't check
>> it...  A copyright transfer is required to use your work.  If not I
>> can send you the forms offline.  If you agree to sign them, I don't
>> think we need to hold up the release before the FSF has received
>> your papers.
>
> Sounds good to me.  I've never signed copyright assignment papers with
> the FSF, but i have no problem assigning copyright for my GnuTLS
> OpenPGP subkey-fingerprinting patch to the FSF.  Send me whatever you
> need for that to take effect, and i'll take care of it.

Sent privately, thank you.

> Thanks for being so responsive on this during your time off.  I'm
> looking forward to the 2.4.0 release.

Me too! :)

> PS as far as i'm concerned, this publically-stated, OpenPGP-signed,
>    published electronic message carries more weight than any forgeable
>    dead-tree silliness, but i'm happy to take equivalent formal and/or
>    archaic steps to smooth things out if other folks think they're
>    needed.

Alas, lawyers seems to prefer dead-tree silliness.

/Simon