4 Aug 2008 07:13
Re: Question about extended attributes...
Timothy Shimmin <tes <at> sgi.com>
2008-08-04 05:13:57 GMT
2008-08-04 05:13:57 GMT
Dave Chinner wrote: > On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 04:55:29PM +1000, Timothy Shimmin wrote: >> Hi Linda, >> >> Linda A. Walsh wrote: >>> my man page says extended xfs attributes can have 256-byte names >>> with up to 64K of data. >>> >>> Is there a limit on the number of extended attributes max data size or >>> name size? >>> >>> I.e. could I have 1000 attributes with 64K of data each? >>> >> Yep. >> >>> Is there a strong reason why the file and data sizes were limited to >>> 256/64K? > > .... > >> I'm not sure why 64K was chosen for a value size limit. > > Because changes to EAs are journalled. Hence there must be a bound > size limit because log space is limited. > Yeah, good point. Which I guess also reflects how we consider extended attributes to be more for metadata. --Tim
RSS Feed