11 Jul 10:49
Re: Performance
From: snovik <snovik <at> gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Performance
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.finance.quantlib.user
Date: 2008-07-11 08:49:22 GMT
Subject: Re: Performance
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.finance.quantlib.user
Date: 2008-07-11 08:49:22 GMT
oh ok. Now it is much faster. The reason I asked is that we are doing a QL port into c# for .NET and I wondered about performance comparission between c# and c++. Obviously c# takes longer but the results for the full equityoption calc on my laptop are: c++ took 5 sec c# took 7 sec. I have to say, c# is not bad at all ;) Ferdinando Ametrano wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 11:51 PM, snovik <snovik <at> gmail.com> wrote: >> How long does it take to run an EquityOption example an a typical pc? By >> typical I mean something like duo-core 2GHz >> >> I have a feeling that it take too long on my machine. > check that you're using Release configuration and not debug > > ciao -- Nando > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! > Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, > along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness > and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08 > _______________________________________________ > QuantLib-users mailing list > QuantLib-users <at> lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-users > > -- -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Performance-tp18307056p18399379.html Sent from the quantlib-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08
RSS Feed