4 Jan 06:48
MUC configuration question
Jason McIntosh <jmac <at> jmac.org>
2005-01-04 05:48:39 GMT
2005-01-04 05:48:39 GMT
Peter, or anyone else who pays more attention to the spec than me: In JEP-0045, are the the Jabber Registrar-defined "muc#roomconfig_foo" fields the _only_ fields that the MUC server should expect in incoming room-configuration forms? I'm currently running into a problem where a new Volity referee is having trouble configuraing a room for the non-anonymity it wants, because the MUC server currently running on volity.net seems to be deaf to all those fields, and offers instead (when asked for a blank form) some completely different, non-namespaced fields of its own. (I am suspecting that the ejabberd MUC (at least the version we're running now) is a little weird and off-spec in other ways -- most notably in that, if I send no config form at all to a new room, other users can still wander in.) -- Jason McIntosh jmac <at> jmac.org Somerville, MA, USA http://www.jmac.org ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt
RSS Feed