1 Oct 2009 08:27
Re: xz for the new release tip
Ralf Corsepius <ralf.corsepius <at> rtems.org>
2009-10-01 06:27:12 GMT
2009-10-01 06:27:12 GMT
On 10/01/2009 08:19 AM, Mark Kettenis wrote: >> Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 22:28:57 +0200 >> From: Jan Kratochvil<jan.kratochvil <at> redhat.com> >> >> Hi, >> >> while currently the sources are release both as .tar.gz and as .tar.bz2 would >> not it be worth to start using .xz as a replacement for the .bz2 variant? >> >> 13406892 bytes: gdb-6.8.91.20090930.tar.xz (xz -9) >> xz -dc: real 0m1.226s user 0m1.190s sys 0m0.037s >> >> 18453837 bytes: gdb-6.8.91.20090930.tar.bz2 >> bzip2 -dc: real 0m3.775s user 0m3.755s sys 0m0.019s > > Never heard of it, so my guess it isn't used widely enough yet to make > sense. Well, zz is the successor of lzma. It's supported as "dist compression" by modern autoconf's (autoconf-2.64), it's the internal compression being used in rpm on modern Linux distros (Fedora, openSUSE), etc. Whether it's stable enough and has a longer term perspective is a different question or will prove to be a yet another temporary anecdote in compression tools is hard to tell - doubts are justified, IMHO. Ralf
RSS Feed