1 Jul 2002 16:49
[Fwd: Re: Reducing the number of special uris in gnome]
Mathias Hasselmann <mathias.hasselmann <at> gmx.de>
2002-07-01 14:49:19 GMT
2002-07-01 14:49:19 GMT
Hmm... Appears like I sent my comment as private mail instead of replying to all (never use a new mail client for "important" messages. Well, so I'm forwarding my opinion again.
From: Mathias Hasselmann <mathias.hasselmann <at> gmx.de>
Subject: Re: Reducing the number of special uris in gnome
Date: 2002-06-28 18:04:51 GMT
Subject: Re: Reducing the number of special uris in gnome
Date: 2002-06-28 18:04:51 GMT
Dave Bordoley wrote: > On Fri, 2002-06-28 at 12:33, Alexander Larsson wrote: > >>So you want to expose the fact to users that our settings dialogs are in >>fact applications? Alexander: Why do you want to hide the fact that the settings dialogs are applications? They are applications. > Seth already made this decision when he put preferences in the > applications menu (and therefore in the applications:// directory). > > (applications://Preferences, applications://system) First: If you click on something that looks like a folder the Upwards-Button should work after that. Anything else just is inconsitent bullshit. Second: It's really confusing the the URL schema changes after clicking on something in the start-here: folder. A good suggestion about how to avoid this feeling was already made in this discussion: When there is and alias for a URL location, display the alias instead of the URL in the location field: alias = gnome_vfs_url_get_human_readable_name(uri); gtk_entry_set_text(GTK_ENTRY(location_entry), alias ? alias : uri); For sake of transparency -- which is very important in my opinion -- the real location should be displayed in the statusline or as tooltip. As statusline it would have the advantage to be a possible target for copy-and-paste actions. Third: Would a tree view for the start-here: folder be useful? Fourth: But that's too late I guess: I'd rename "start-here:" to "gnome:". Ciao, Mathias
. Well, so I'm forwarding my opinion again.
RSS Feed