7 Jun 2012 15:48
[bug #36607] norminv doesn't work for very small values
anonymous <INVALID.NOREPLY <at> gnu.org>
2012-06-07 13:48:53 GMT
2012-06-07 13:48:53 GMT
Please use the bug tracker to post updates to a bug report. The mailing list is intended as a read-only notification stream. Info posted to this mailing list address won't appear in the tracker database where it is most useful. URL: <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?36607> Summary: norminv doesn't work for very small values Project: GNU Octave Submitted by: None Submitted on: Thu 07 Jun 2012 01:48:52 PM UTC Category: None Severity: 3 - Normal Priority: 5 - Normal Item Group: None Status: None Assigned to: None Originator Name: Originator Email: Open/Closed: Open Discussion Lock: Any Release: 3.6.1 Operating System: GNU/Linux _______________________________________________________ Details: For small inputs, norminv in Octave gives a different result from Matlab. For very small inputs, norminv in Octave gives -Inf, while Matlab gives a valid answer. For example, in Octave I get norminv(10^(-16)) ans = -8.2095 norminv(10^(-17)) ans = -Inf while in Matlab I get norminv(10^(-16)) ans = -8.2221 norminv(10^(-17)) ans = -8.4938 I am using Octave 3.6.1 compiled from source on Ubuntu 11.10, and Matlab R2010a. _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?36607> _______________________________________________ Message sent via/by Savannah http://savannah.gnu.org/
RSS Feed