1 Jun 2010 14:41
Re: [oe] Is Angstrom dead?
butters <butters <at> station51.net>
2010-06-01 12:41:12 GMT
2010-06-01 12:41:12 GMT
Well for me, the Gnome Image is failing. As I wrote previously without anyone coming up with a fix. The full gnome set was available from the Ångström site a couple a months ago via the image builder, now selecting gnome on that fails with a big red X .... It would be nice if the STABLE builds of things, and things that actually work, would be available in the image builder instead of just unstable, and it would be nice if we could have access to stable code instead of always bleeding edge stuff via OpenEmbedded. I'm only saying this because you seem to be involved in it, so I just wanted to voice my opinion and get your response lol Thanks! Bill On 6/1/2010 2:09 PM, Graeme Gregory wrote: > On Tue, 01 Jun 2010 06:03:09 -0600 > Gary Thomas<gary <at> mlbassoc.com> wrote: > > >> It sure feels like it>> >> > No, we are certainly alive, but as we seem to have decreased to only 2 > or 3 people who actively say they are developing Angstrom it can seem a > bit quiet at times. > > Graeme > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > Openembedded-devel <at> lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel >
>>
>>
> No, we are certainly alive, but as we seem to have decreased to only 2
> or 3 people who actively say they are developing Angstrom it can seem a
> bit quiet at times.
>
> Graeme
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel <at> lists.openembedded.org
>
RSS Feed