Re: RFC: Stupid spec constants revisited

Hi,

On Fri, 2006-02-10 at 14:20 -0700, Tom Tromey wrote:
> IMO the current patch is fine.  It isn't unclear.  And, bizarrely,
> we'll have plenty of email threads to refer people to on the off
> chance that somebody doesn't understand it.  

Hehe. This must be the most discussed patch ever. And that for a simple
two-liner patch! I still think this is a bit silly. And we shouldn't
really have these fields. But it seems I am outvoted, and if we do have
these fields it does no harm to have the same values in them. And I have
noticed that Stuart actually has much more seniority then I have. He has
been a GNU Classpath hacker since 1998 (years before I even joined the
project!)

So I finally just checked it in.

Cheers,

Mark