Mark | 26 May 2012 01:58
Picon

core.logic and aggregates: am i doing it wrong?

I confess that the last time I cracked open a Prolog book was lo these many years ago in college and that I need to re-read The Art but I'm hoping that someone can point out how I'm thinking about this problem wrongly:
I'd like to write a goal that succeeds when given a set of required items and a set of supplied items, the supplied items is a proper superset of the required items.  My intuition is that I want a goal that succeeds and 'returns' the common subset of the two sets and then another goal that tries to unify the subset with the required items:

(defn satisfes-requirements-o [required given]
  (let [subset (run* [q]
                     (membero q required)
                     (membero q given))]
    (== subset required)))

I'm basically treating the subset operation as a subrouting and using run*  to aggregate the common elements.  This feels wrong and it feels like I should use something less procedural but I can't wrap my brain around how else to approach the problem.  Suggestions?  Hints?

Thanks

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure <at> googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscribe <at> googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Gmane