Re: [drools-dev] Schema

On Nov 1, 2004, at 12:59 PM, Roger F. Gay wrote:
> I see a lot of work to be done related to the schema
> (directly and indirectly related – dependent), work
> that could benefit the drools project immensely.
> There's plenty of work for everyone, and I don't see
> the benefit of spinning the wheels in one place.

excellent! can you create an issue in JIRA and attach patches to bring 
the schemas in CVS up to the level where they need to be?

> Have you closed this part of the project to outside
> contributions? Has a drools-wide decision been made to
> limit interest in building new products and technology
> that incorporate drools?

not at all... its just that drools is a do-ocracy and Mark has been 
doing a lot of the work. (Thanks Mark!)

we're more than happy to incorporate outside contributions, we just ask 
that patches against the CVS code be attached to a JIRA issue at which 
point in time they'll get reviewed and either applied or feedback 
given.
-pete