Roger F. Gay | 3 Nov 2004 15:15
Picon
Favicon
Gravatar

Re: [drools-dev] Schema


I also submitted DROOLS-62, which is reported as
linked to DROOLS-65 and I've asked for review of the
JIRA issue (65) that you've pointed to, but have not
recieved any concrete response. The old Schema set
that is referred to in that JIRA comment (65) has been
updated and distributed, but not put in CVS, and not
noted in JIRA.

I've also asked Bob to check on my JIRA access.
Apparently, I don't remember my account name or
password -- because I was unsuccessful when I tried to
log in -- maybe something to do with the new website
-- don't even know if my account is still active.

I currently live in a place in Sweden in which
internet access is very expensive, so I am using cyber
cafes for the moment. It is not practical for me to
set up for CVS upload and IRC access unless there are
some new tricks for doing so that I don't know about.

I've asked for help getting these tasks taken care of.

--- peter royal <peter.royal <at> pobox.com> wrote:

> On Nov 2, 2004, at 10:21 AM, Roger F. Gay wrote:
> > You're evading the questions. A complete schema
> set
> > has already been created and contributed. A second
> > effort, almost complete has been reported that
> > separates the base schema completely from semantic
> > support schema.
> >
> > This isn't at all about out of date schemas. This
> is
> > the situation now. Why are you driving forward as
> > though none of that work has been done?
> 
> Roger, I don't see a JIRA issue for any updated
> schemas, did I overlook 
> it?
> 
> The only open JIRA issue wrt schemas I found was:
> 
> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/DROOLS-65
> 
> .. and that's a year old (and clearly references
> out-of-date schemas).
> 
> It sounds as if your work is useful and may be more
> comprehensive than 
> what Mark has. Please create a JIRA issue with
> patches against the 
> current codebase and we'll check it out.
> cheers
> -pete

> ATTACHMENT part 2 application/pkcs7-signature
name=smime.p7s

=====
Correlation does not prove causality.

		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Check out the new Yahoo! Front Page. 
www.yahoo.com 


Gmane