17 May 2010 23:45
Re: HotSpot 17 merge
Andrew John Hughes wrote: > On 17 May 2010 20:54, Joe Darcy <joe.darcy@...> wrote: > >> Andrew John Hughes wrote: >> >>> On 17 May 2010 18:08, Vladimir Kozlov <vladimir.kozlov@...> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Andrew, >>>> >>>> yes, you should revert/remove the 6909480 changeset in OpenJDK6 after >>>> merge >>>> with hs17 >>>> >>>> Vladimir >>>> >>>> Andrew John Hughes wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> On 17 May 2010 17:29, Vladimir Kozlov <vladimir.kozlov@...> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> When we released jdk6u18 (hs16) there were 2 EA critical bugs >>>>>> for which we did not have time to fix in 6u18: >>>>>> >>>>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/hotspot-comp/hotspot/rev/f96a1a986f7b >>>>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/hotspot-comp/hotspot/rev/7fee0a6cc6d4 >>>>>> >>>>>> In short, with escape analysis the generated code produces NULL(0) >>>>>> instead of expected (stored) values. >>>>>> >>>>>> There was no enough time for full testing in 6u18 and changes were too >>>>>> big. >>>>>> I would advice to not use EA with HS16. >>>>>> >>>>>> In hs17 we enabled EA again and tested it until 6u21 release in which >>>>>> the default flag's value is set to false but you can specify the flag >>>>>> on command line to enable EA. There are few problems which needs to be >>>>>> fixed before we enable EA by default. >>>>>> >>>>>> Andrew, you are right to not merge changes from hs16. And you can use >>>>>> the flag on command line for HS17 instead of patch to enable EA. >>>>>> It would be easier for benchmarking. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> Unfortunately it's not a matter of choosing not to merge the change, >>>>> but having to revert it as it's already part of OpenJDK6 from the >>>>> earlier hs16 merge (currently showing up as a difference between >>>>> OpenJDK6's HotSpot and the hs17 branch). See the results and >>>>> discussion in the mail I just posted. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Vladimir >>>>>> >>>>>> Andrew John Hughes wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 16 May 2010 18:22, Andrew Haley <aph@...> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 05/16/2010 05:14 PM, Andrew John Hughes wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The webrev is here: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~andrew/jdk6-hs17-merge/ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I'd also like to revert: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 6909480: Disable Escape Analysis in jdk 6u18 >>>>>>>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/hsx/hsx16/master/rev/4ebd3f8407eb >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> which isn't present in hs17 (and so remains a difference between >>>>>>>>> jdk6 >>>>>>>>> and hs17) as, unlike jdk6's version, hs17 is based on the main >>>>>>>>> HotSpot >>>>>>>>> tree rather than the hs16 master. I didn't include this in the >>>>>>>>> merge >>>>>>>>> because it's clearer what's going on if it appears as a separate >>>>>>>>> change. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Ahh, good catch. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Do we have any idea why escape analysis is disabled? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Andrew. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> I assume it wasn't stable enough in hs16, but the bug isn't visible. >>>>>>> Can someone from the HotSpot team shed more light on this? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>> Yeah>>> >>> Just waiting for the go-ahead from Joe now... >>> >>> >> Hello. >> >> I just finished looking over the lengthy patch. >> >> I approve the patch to update OpenJDK 6 to HS17 going back along with the >> subsequence reverting of 6909480. >> >> Thanks, >> >> -Joe >> >> > > I've pushed the merge. I guess I'll need a bug ID to push the > reversion. Can you provide me with one? > > 6953222 Revert change for 6909480 in OpenJDK 6 Cheers, -Joe
>>>
>>> Just waiting for the go-ahead from Joe now...
>>>
>>>
>> Hello.
>>
>> I just finished looking over the lengthy patch.
>>
>> I approve the patch to update OpenJDK 6 to HS17 going back along with the
>> subsequence reverting of 6909480.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> -Joe
>>
>>
>
> I've pushed the merge. I guess I'll need a bug ID to push the
> reversion. Can you provide me with one?
>
>
6953222 Revert change for 6909480 in OpenJDK 6
Cheers,
-Joe
RSS Feed