Re: State of kdefx

On Wednesday 01 August 2007 11:51:50 am Matthew Woehlke wrote:
> Mosfet wrote:
> > On Wednesday 01 August 2007 11:06:03 am Matthew Woehlke wrote:
> >> In that case, can we integrate Blitz
> >> into KDE's svn, or what? Replacing kdefx (i.e. put it in kdelibs for
> >> now) would be the least hassle for others. Any thoughts on making Blitz
> >> also static to avoid BC issues when we remove it?
> >
> > That's fine as long as non-SVN apps can access it.
>
> What do you mean by "non-SVN apps"? If we move it to kdelibs it will be
> equally accessible as kdefx. Do you mean non-KDE apps should be able to
> use it?
>

No, just that the headers and stuff be installed. Static is absolutely fine 
with me, no problems.

Just let me finish up a few more changes here and I'll send you a new tarball.

...snip...