2 Apr 2004 09:04
Re: Re: [groovy-user] Language Spec
On 1 Apr 2004, at 22:58, Cedric Beust wrote: > Please allow me to share a few thoughts, motivated by my > participation in JSR 175 and JSR 201, both of them heavily > language-focused. > > Neil Ellis wrote: > > I like to think we have provided food for thought for the JSR team – > but I’d also like to re-iterate, for myself at least, confidence in > those making decisions on our behalf. As has been said many times by > people on the list we do not want a language designed by committee – > we just want to feed some worthwhile ideas to the man in charge. > Well, I am afraid it's not going to be as simple as that. > > At some point, a spec needs to be written and it takes some very > particular skills to be able to do that. I know I can't, and I > realized over these past years that actually, very few people can do > that. > > A JSR is a work of compromise and the epitomy of design by > committee. Sorry to break it out to you, but it's going to involve > the participation of a lot of people with different views and > compromises that can, and will, sometimes conflict with James' > original vision. > > What I am getting at is this: the best way to guarantee the success > of this JSR is to pair up James with someone who is good at writing > specs and who will be able to bring some realism to the debates, aside > from any personal or aesthetic considerations. Josh is absolutely > brilliant at that, but even he defers the final writing of the > language spec to Gilad (yes, writing a language spec is that hard). > > Please do not take this as a critique of James, I am absolutely in > love with Groovy and James and I agree on so many points on a > technical level that I suspect he might be my lost brother from over > the PondLOL > But if we want to be serious with this JSR and not become like > countless other JSR's that have been in limbo for years, we need to > get ready to face compromises. Agreed. James ------- http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
LOL
> But if we want to be serious with this JSR and not become like
> countless other JSR's that have been in limbo for years, we need to
> get ready to face compromises.
Agreed.
James
-------
RSS Feed