jastrachan | 19 Jul 09:40 2004

Re: Serializable Groovy Objects

On 19 Jul 2004, at 08:29, John Wilson wrote:

> There don't seem to be many Groovy objects which implement 
> Serializable and those that do do so because they extend a 
> serializable Java object. Is there any fundamental reason for this or 
> is it just that we haven't got round to adding the interface yet?

We've just not got around to implementing them yet I guess.

> I'm wondering if MetaClass and MetaClassRegistry make things a bit 
> tricky.

The MetaClass should be transient.