Re: Timings for the new version of Closure

Who-hoo! Great work John! I like nicer numbers :)

On 18 May 2004, at 11:18, John Wilson wrote:
> On 18 May 2004, at 10:38, bing ran wrote:
>
>> Good numbers, John!
>>
>
> It's just occurred to me that I'm including the loop overhead in the 
> timings. I've measure the time to do an empty loop and it's 300  
> milliseconds!
>
> So the numbers I posted originally have to be reduces by 300 (both 
> versions)
>
> This gives:
>
> No parameters passed
> Released 2,750	CVS Head 126
> One parameter passed
> Released 2,867	CVS Head 157
> Two parameters passed
> Released 3,280	CVS Head 366
> Three parameters passed
> Released 3,860	CVS Head 659
>
> Even nicer numbers!
>
> John Wilson
> The Wilson Partnership
> http://www.wilson.co.uk
>
> _______________________________________________
> groovy-user mailing list
> groovy-user@...
> http://lists.codehaus.org/mailman/listinfo/groovy-user
>
>

James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/