Re: [groovy-user] what's the state of groosh?

On Monday 07 January 2008 2:48 pm, Alexander Egger escreveu:
> I am still working on it. Nevertheless .execute() seams to be used more and
> has a lot of the features groosh provides.

Except that I often find that execute has buffering problems, so I used 
someone's idea to have separate threads to gobble up the two outputs, stdout 
and stderr so that the process doesn't get blocked.   so I've written my own 
wrapper around execute.   So I guess that yes, I do use it.

but I like what I see, but don't fully understand, of the grid method in 
groosh.   I haven't used groosh yet, but it looks pretty neat.

>
> I use groosh for my own cmd line scripting and implement the features I
> need and fix the bugs I find.
>
> I will release a new version in the next few days.
>
> Any input and help is very welcome.
>
>
>
> Alexander
>
> On Jan 2, 2008 9:14 AM, Guillaume Laforge <glaforge@...> wrote:
> > Groosh has recently been updated and is being worked on by Alexander
> > Egger.
> >
> > On Jan 2, 2008 3:25 AM, Thomas R. Corbin <thomas.corbin@...> wrote:
> > > It looks like fun and I'm curious about using it, but if it's dead I
> > > don't want to mess with it.
> >
> > --
> > Guillaume Laforge
> > Groovy Project Manager
> > G2One, Inc. Vice-President Technology
> > http://www.g2one.com
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
> >
> >     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email