4 Dec 09:19
Re: IVars
Lennart Augustsson <lennart <at> augustsson.net>
2007-12-04 08:19:23 GMT
2007-12-04 08:19:23 GMT
Good question. That must be a matter of taste, because as you say the read will always produce the same result. But it sill is a bit of a strange operation.
-- Lennart
On Dec 4, 2007 6:25 AM, Conal Elliott <
conal <at> conal.net> wrote:
Oh. Simple enough. Thanks.
Another question: why the IO in readIVar :: IVar a -> IO a, instead of just readIVar :: IVar a -> a? After all, won't readIVar iv yield the same result (eventually) every time it's called?On Dec 3, 2007 12:29 AM, Lennart Augustsson <lennart <at> augustsson.net> wrote:You can make them from MVars.On Dec 2, 2007 8:03 PM, Conal Elliott <conal <at> conal.net> wrote:
what became of (assign-once) IVars? afaict, they were in concurrent haskell and now aren't._______________________________________________
Haskell mailing list
Haskell <at> haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
_______________________________________________
Haskell mailing list
Haskell <at> haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
_______________________________________________ Haskell mailing list Haskell <at> haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
RSS Feed