Re: #4189: Add (<.>) operator (generalizing (.) to Functor)

On Sun, 1 Aug 2010, John Meacham wrote:

> Then clearly we should use this as the operator.
>
>>                     .--.
>>                    ."  o \__
>>                 _.-"    ,(  `
>>             _.-"      ,;;|
>>        _.-=" _,"    ,,;;;'
>>    .-"`_.-"``-..,,;;;;:'
>>    `"'`          `\`\
>>                   /^\\\
>
> We will just have to tweak the layout rule a little to accept it..

That's the best proposal for an infix operator I have ever seen! However, 
I'm afraid that GHC will reject it since the bird's eye is a letter.