10 Jan 13:21
Re: Announcement: Typeful [x]html combinators -- pre-release 0
Tomasz Zielonka <tomasz.zielonka <at> gmail.com>
2008-01-10 12:21:17 GMT
2008-01-10 12:21:17 GMT
On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 02:43:08PM +0000, Jon Fairbairn wrote: > > It contains a monadic combinator library that checks > > proper nesting of HTML tags at compile time. The library > > also has an unchecked version, > > It's possible that I only tried the unchecked version: I > just thought of an invalid example, read what documentation > I could find and generated some invalid html. That's an easy trap to fall into, especially because the author seems to use only unchecked combinators in examples> However, > Thiemann's thesis says > > The current library implements neither inclusions nor > exceptions. > > So I hope I might be forgiven if I overlooked a difference > between the distribution and the thesis! Does the checked > version now enforce appendix B and prevent <a> appearing > anywhere within <a> and so on? I am not familiar with the HTML standards enough to understand everything you say here, but I've just checked that you can't put <a> inside <a> using the checked combinators. But I can't say if it checks everything your library checks. > Another difference is that I haven't used any non-Haskell 98 > constructs other than using Template Haskell to generate > class declarations and instances (were one so inclined, one > could get ghc to output the splices and [clean them up by > hand to] produce an entirely H98 version). I can't think of any non-haskell 98 extensions that were used in WASH/HTML, but I may be overlooking something. At least the interface of WASH.HTML.HTMLMonad98 looks quite standard. Best regards Tomasz
> However,
> Thiemann's thesis says
>
> The current library implements neither inclusions nor
> exceptions.
>
> So I hope I might be forgiven if I overlooked a difference
> between the distribution and the thesis! Does the checked
> version now enforce appendix B and prevent <a> appearing
> anywhere within <a> and so on?
I am not familiar with the HTML standards enough to understand
everything you say here, but I've just checked that you can't put <a>
inside <a> using the checked combinators. But I can't say if it
checks everything your library checks.
> Another difference is that I haven't used any non-Haskell 98
> constructs other than using Template Haskell to generate
> class declarations and instances (were one so inclined, one
> could get ghc to output the splices and [clean them up by
> hand to] produce an entirely H98 version).
I can't think of any non-haskell 98 extensions that were used in
WASH/HTML, but I may be overlooking something. At least the interface of
WASH.HTML.HTMLMonad98 looks quite standard.
Best regards
Tomasz
RSS Feed