17 Nov 13:34
Re: Thoughts on some test reorganization
From: Chris Fields <cjfields <at> illinois.edu>
Subject: Re: Thoughts on some test reorganization
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.perl.bio.general
Date: 2008-11-17 12:34:34 GMT
Subject: Re: Thoughts on some test reorganization
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.perl.bio.general
Date: 2008-11-17 12:34:34 GMT
5.8 will be supported for a while. Personally I use 5.10 with bioperl and only found a few issues that were fairly easy to deal with. But then again, I am also messing around with Rakudo Perl (6). chris On Nov 17, 2008, at 3:55 AM, Spiros Denaxas wrote: > I agree, 5.10 is the new cool kid on the block yet I have not come > across > many people that can firmly say they use it in a production / > commercial > environment. > I will chime in and say that, ideally, support for 5.8.* should be a > few > years at least from going away. > > Spiros > > On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 3:43 AM, Hilmar Lapp <hlapp <at> gmx.net> wrote: > >> >> On Nov 16, 2008, at 9:34 PM, Chris Fields wrote: >> >> 5.8.x is about to be 'end-of-lifed' >>> >> >> >> Interesting. 5.8.x is the version of Perl for Mac OSX Leopard (and >> Tiger, >> too) - I don't see the need to support it going away any time soon. >> >> -hilmar >> -- >> =========================================================== >> : Hilmar Lapp -:- Durham, NC -:- hlapp at gmx dot net : >> =========================================================== >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Bioperl-l mailing list >> Bioperl-l <at> lists.open-bio.org >> http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l >> > _______________________________________________ > Bioperl-l mailing list > Bioperl-l <at> lists.open-bio.org > http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l
RSS Feed