Fields, Christopher J | 5 Feb 20:34 2013

Removing Bio::FeatureIO? was Re: removing packages from bioperl-live

Probably should retitle this to ask the question directly (make sure the right radars are pinged).

My vote is yes, it should be removed.  There were a lot of implementation issues with it that ended up becoming
problematic.  I do believe it is used, though, so I would like to get additional responses from the
community before removing it and pointing to the separate repository (where there has been a lot of
experimenting going on).


On Feb 5, 2013, at 12:56 PM, Carnë Draug <carandraug+dev <at>> wrote:

> Hi
> some of the bioperl-live packages have already been split into
> separate repositories. However, they were never actually removed from
> bioperl-live. This creates 2 entry points for bug fixes and
> implementations. After a chat on #bioperl, I was told to ask here.
> Should these be removed? For example, there's bioperl-FeatureIO but
> that code alo exists in bioperl-live. Can I remove it from
> bioperl-live?
> Carnë
> _______________________________________________
> Bioperl-l mailing list
> Bioperl-l <at>