5 Feb 2013 21:59
Re: Removing Bio::FeatureIO? was Re: removing packages from bioperl-live
Fields, Christopher J <cjfields <at> illinois.edu>
2013-02-05 20:59:38 GMT
2013-02-05 20:59:38 GMT
On Feb 5, 2013, at 2:10 PM, Carnë Draug <carandraug+dev <at> gmail.com> wrote: > On 5 February 2013 19:34, Fields, Christopher J <cjfields <at> illinois.edu> wrote: >> Probably should retitle this to ask the question directly (make sure the right radars are pinged). >> >> My vote is yes, it should be removed. There were a lot of implementation issues with it that ended up becoming problematic. I do believe it is used, though, so I would like to get additional responses from the community before removing it and pointing to the separate repository (where there has been a lot of experimenting going on). > > Mentioning Bio::FeatureIO was just an example. I meant to ask it as > more general. If the code is already in a separate repository, should > it be removed from bioperl-live? > > Carnë Yes for Bio::FeatureIO, no for Bio::Root::Root and the others at the moment (I want to get a release out by March 1, which I'm planning on announcing later today, so the less disruptive it is the better). Once we get a new release out we should remove the rest. chris
RSS Feed