On Feb 5, 2013, at 2:10 PM, Carnë Draug wrote:
> On 5 February 2013 19:34, Fields, Christopher J
>> Probably should retitle this to ask the question directly (make sure the
right radars are pinged).
>> My vote is yes, it should be removed. There were a lot of
implementation issues with it that ended up becoming problematic. I do
believe it is used, though, so I would like to get additional responses
from the community before removing it and pointing to the separate
repository (where there has been a lot of experimenting going on).
> Mentioning Bio::FeatureIO was just an example. I meant to ask it as
> more general. If the code is already in a separate repository, should
> it be removed from bioperl-live?
Yes for Bio::FeatureIO, no for Bio::Root::Root and the others at the moment
(I want to get a release out by March 1, which I'm planning on announcing
later today, so the less disruptive it is the better). Once we get a new
release out we should remove the rest.