6 Feb 2013 05:11
Re: dependencies on perl version
Leon Timmermans <l.m.timmermans <at> students.uu.nl>
2013-02-06 04:11:52 GMT
2013-02-06 04:11:52 GMT
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 4:32 AM, Hilmar Lapp <hlapp <at> drycafe.net> wrote: > Does anyone know what Ubuntu uses? 5.14.2, distrowatch is your friend> I've heard lots of other old version problems with CentOS. I know people who still use CentOS 4 in production
> 8 years is really old, and at some point I fear that weighing backwards compatibility too much just holds us back in a real detrimental way. CentOS 5 is 6 years old (and will be supported another 4), but CentOS 6 is 'only' 19 months. perl missing a release in the 5.8-5.10 timeframe combined with an unfortunate alignment of its release schedule with Red Hat's don't do us any favors here. Leon
> I've heard lots of other old version problems with CentOS.
I know people who still use CentOS 4 in production
> 8 years is really old, and at some point I fear that weighing backwards compatibility too much just holds us
back in a real detrimental way.
CentOS 5 is 6 years old (and will be supported another 4), but CentOS
6 is 'only' 19 months. perl missing a release in the 5.8-5.10
timeframe combined with an unfortunate alignment of its release
schedule with Red Hat's don't do us any favors here.
Leon
RSS Feed