Re: BioPerl future

On Feb 10, 2013, at 12:40 PM, Carnë Draug <carandraug+dev <at> gmail.com> wrote:

> On 10 February 2013 17:00,  <bioperl-l-request <at> lists.open-bio.org> wrote:
>> Message: 3
>> Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2013 20:36:07 -0800
>> From: John SJ Anderson <genehack <at> genehack.org>
>> Subject: Re: [Bioperl-l] BioPerl future
>> To: "Fields, Christopher J" <cjfields <at> illinois.edu>
>> Cc: BioPerl List <Bioperl-l <at> lists.open-bio.org>
>> Message-ID: <668BED38-61AE-4D21-A3BD-B7AEC9361EF6 <at> genehack.org>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>> 
>> On Feb 9, 2013, at 8:25 PM, "Fields, Christopher J" <cjfields <at> illinois.edu> wrote:
>> 
>>> Thoughts?
>> 
>> +1
>> 
>> The other thing to maybe give some advance thought to is organization of the new development. Maybe
instead of one big repository, we can encourage the more loosely coupled small pieces that everybody
seems to realize we need by having more, smaller repositories.
> 
> For those interested, I have just added instructions on the wiki on
> how to split a subset of modules, tests, files, etc from the
> bioperl-live repository into a new repository while keeping their old
> history.
> 
> http://www.bioperl.org/wiki/Using_Git/Advanced#Split_a_module_from_bioperl-live
> 
> Carnë

It's probably worth looking at this page as well, then:

http://www.bioperl.org/wiki/BioPerl_Modularization

We should probably merge the two.

chris