On Feb 13, 2013, at 1:44 PM, Leon Timmermans
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 7:05 PM, Fields, Christopher J
>> We can work on a bioperl-run release. It's too much to handle both in
one go. The problem I have faced with bioperl-run in the past is similar
to bioperl-live, that the tools used are a moving target and that makes the
wrappers easily out-of-date. I would really like a more flexible generic
way of defining these that would allow for easier maintenance.
> Also, bioperl-run needs to be cut into smaller distributions even more
> than bioperl-live. Few people if anyone at all has all tools it tries
> to wrap at hand, so its almost impossible to pass its testing suite.
> We need dists that can realistically pass.
Yup. It's a mess.