On Apr 1, 2013, at 11:49 AM, Hilmar Lapp  wrote:

> 
> On Mar 31, 2013, at 11:28 PM, Fields, Christopher J wrote:
> 
>> a case would have to be made as to why the initial run at it wasn't
completed, or why it would work better this time.  We're not suggesting
that this can't be done, but the above point would have to be answered.
> 
> Perhaps just to clarify a bit, as an applying student the readers you'd
have in mind for making the case to aren't the senior BioPerl developers or
potential mentors (who'd know much of your argument already), but rather
those from other OBF projects who will take part in prioritizing
applications across the OBF board, but won't know much about the specific
BioPerl situation.
> 
> 	-hilmar

Yep, exactly.

-c