Fields, Christopher J | 4 Apr 02:47 2013

Re: releasing Bio-Root

No, leave them.  If we do another 1.6 series release it will be from that branch, but if this progresses far
enough we should just move to incremental 1.7 releases.

Chris

Sent via a capable phone of some make and model

-------- Original message --------
From: Carnë Draug <carandraug+dev <at> gmail.com>
Date: 04/03/2013 5:42 PM (GMT-06:00)
To: "Fields, Christopher J" <cjfields <at> illinois.edu>
Cc: bioperl mailing list <bioperl-l <at> lists.open-bio.org>
Subject: Re: releasing Bio-Root

On 2 April 2013 05:54, Fields, Christopher J <cjfields <at> illinois.edu> wrote:
> On Apr 1, 2013, at 11:18 PM, Carnë Draug <carandraug+dev <at> gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I have removed the Bio::Root modules and tests from bioperl-live that
>> are part of the Bio-Root distribution (that leaves one behind which
>> was not forgotten. It was imported back in 2011 and then removed).
>
> Okay.

I didn't remove them from the branch v1 in bioperl-live. Should I?

Carnë

Gmane