Brian Osborne | 16 Jul 17:18 2013
Picon
Picon

Re: HMMER 3 update

Jason,

Done, and I added a strand() method to Bio::Search::HSP::GenericHSP. There's a lot of inheritance in
these "HSP" modules but it looks like this is the right place, as judged by the other methods in the module.

Double-checked all the _other_ SearchIO tests, they're all passing.

BIO

On Jul 15, 2013, at 12:30 AM, Jason Stajich <jason.stajich <at> gmail.com> wrote:

> Brian -
> 
> I think a branch is good idea, probably just from master as I presume this code will be too new to weave into
the v1 branch. 
> 
> However, I'm still not clear on how the new packaging is going to go - but I presume there will be a SearchIO
package that we'd update and release when needed? Is there any move to split that off - I know we had settled
on the idea that the essential bits of a core would be at least some sequence and blast/homology search parsers.
> 
> But would more 'exotic' parsers live in their own package or all things SearchIO would go together?
> 
> Glad to see this being work on Brian -- will also have to make sure to capture strand info which we didn't have
to deal with for protein queries.
> 
> Jason
> On Jul 12, 2013, at 1:05 PM, Brian Osborne <bosborne11 <at> verizon.net> wrote:
> 
>> bioperl,
>> 
>> HMMER 3.1 contains a new program called nhmmer, its output is a bit different from the existing so I need to
edit SearchIO::hmmer3.
>> 
>> Create a new branch for this?
>> 
>> Brian O.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bioperl-l mailing list
>> Bioperl-l <at> lists.open-bio.org
>> http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l
> 
> Jason Stajich
> jason.stajich <at> gmail.com
> jason <at> bioperl.org
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Bioperl-l mailing list
> Bioperl-l <at> lists.open-bio.org
> http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l

Gmane