Home
Reading
Searching
Subscribe
Sponsors
Statistics
Posting
Contact
Spam
Lists
Links
About
Hosting
Filtering
Features Download
Marketing
Archives
FAQ
Blog
 
Gmane
From: Govind Chandra <govind.chandra <at> jic.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: BioPerl release 1.6.923
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.perl.bio.general
Date: Thursday 19th December 2013 17:24:10 UTC (over 2 years ago)
Thanks Chris and others for release 1.6.923.

The issue with Genbank files having CONTIG lines in them seems
sorted. Output of the test script is pasted below.

Best wishes

Govind

### Output begins ###

withContigLine.gbk

Bioperl reports length as 19314.
Length of the sequence string is 19314.

=========================================

withoutContigLine.gbk

Bioperl reports length as 19314.
Length of the sequence string is 19314.

=========================================

Perl version is: 5.018000
Bioperl version is: 1.006923
Bioperl version again: 49.46.48.48.54.57.50.51

### Output ends ###

Govind Chandra
Molecular Microbiology
John Innes Centre
Norwich
UK.



On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 12:00:04PM -0500,
[email protected] wrote:
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 10:26:19 +0000
> From: Govind Chandra <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Bioperl-l] Genbank files with CONTIG lines in them.
> To: 
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> 
> Thanks Chris and Peter.
> 
> Best wishes
> 
> Govind
> 
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 12:00:03PM -0500,
[email protected] wrote:
> > Message: 3
> > Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 13:46:29 +0000
> > From: "Fields, Christopher J" 
> > Subject: Re: [Bioperl-l] Genbank files with CONTIG lines in them.
> > To: Peter Cock 
> > Cc: Govind Chandra <[email protected]>,	BioPerl List
> > 	
> > Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
> > 
> > On Dec 17, 2013, at 7:32 AM, Peter Cock 
wrote:
> > 
> > > On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Govind Chandra
> > > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >> Hi Chris,
> > >> 
> > >> As you suggested, I upgraded to Bioperl version 1.6.922 but the
> > >> problem remains. Below is the output of my test script again.
> > >> 
> > >> withContigLine.gbk
> > >> 
> > >> Bioperl reports length as 19314.
> > >> Length of the sequence string is .
> > >> 
> > >> =========================================
> > >> 
> > >> withoutContigLine.gbk
> > >> 
> > >> Bioperl reports length as 19314.
> > >> Length of the sequence string is 19314.
> > >> 
> > >> =========================================
> > >> 
> > >> Perl version is: 5.018000
> > >> Bioperl version is: 1.006922
> > >> Bioperl version again: 49.46.48.48.54.57.50.50
> > >> 
> > >> Thanks
> > >> 
> > >> Govind
> > > 
> > > This sounds like the issue raised in July and again in October,
> > > where Chris thought it had been fixed:
> > > http://lists.open-bio.org/pipermail/bioperl-l/2013-October/071235.html
> > > 
> > > See also point [2] in this NCBI RefSeq announcement:
> > > http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/mailman/pipermail/refseq-announce/2013q3/000110.html
> > > 
> > > Peter
> > 
> > Yep, it should be addressed:
> > 
> > https://github.com/bioperl/bioperl-live/commit/dd2cd5f1c46fa97bff21524a3e1c6a14f57d2b02
> > 
> > Looks like it didn?t make the last release.  I?ll have a look at trying
to get a 1.6 point release out to fix it.
> > 
> > chris
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ------------------------------
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Bioperl-l mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l
> > 
> > End of Bioperl-l Digest, Vol 128, Issue 8
> > *****************************************
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Bioperl-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l
> 
> End of Bioperl-l Digest, Vol 128, Issue 9
> *****************************************
 
CD: 3ms