Re: Recommended EU::MM Compatibility?

On Apr 2, 2009, at 11:11 AM, David Golden wrote:

>> In most of my modules. I get the impression that this is no longer
>> recommended, however. So what is?
>
> I use 'traditional' for anything that doesn't have dynamic
> requirements (e.g. custom code in Build.PL).  In those cases, I leave
> out a Makefile.PL entirely.

Similar to what Eric suggested, but with traditional instead of pass- 
through. But why not just use pass-through for those that *do* have  
dynamic requirements?

Best,

David