Re: Adding both mozilla1.0 and mozilla1.1 to the list of licenses

David Golden said:
> On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 7:25 AM, Gabor Szabo <szabgab <at> gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I am now trying to get Bugzilla packaged to CPAN and it is 
>> explicitely licensed under mozilla1.1
>>
>> Would it be possible to add those two keys to the valid list of values
>> of the license field?
>> Software::License http://search.cpan.org/dist/Software-License/
>> already has them separated.
>
> Hi, Gabor.  Just list it as "mozilla" or "open_source" for now. 
> The way licenses get handled will be revised when we release the 
> CPAN Meta 2.0 spec later this year.  (And both Mozilla licenses are 
> already included separately in the valid list in the draft 2.0 
> spec).

Nice. How about AGPL_v3?

Is the draft spec available for review somewhere? :)

- Salve, who would like to see a few more licenses added to M:B anyway

--

-- 
#!/usr/bin/perl
sub AUTOLOAD{$AUTOLOAD=~/.*::(\d+)/;seek(DATA,$1,0);print#  Salve Joshua Nilsen
getc DATA}$"="'};&{'"; <at> _=unpack("C*",unpack("u*",':4 <at> ,$'.#     <sjn <at> foo.no>
'2!--"5-(50P%$PL,!0X354UC-PP%/0\`'."\n"));eval "&{' <at> _'}";   __END__ is near! :)