15 May 22:32
Re: Ruby 1.9 compatibility and performance
From: Rick DeNatale <rick.denatale <at> gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Ruby 1.9 compatibility and performance
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.ruby.general
Date: 2008-05-15 20:32:17 GMT
Subject: Re: Ruby 1.9 compatibility and performance
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.ruby.general
Date: 2008-05-15 20:32:17 GMT
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 4:13 PM, Phillip Gawlowski <cmdjackryan <at> googlemail.com> wrote: > Ruby 1.9 is a testbed of sorts for the eventual Ruby 2.0, and not > considered production ready in any way. Actually, not quite true. It used to be the case that a x.y version number for Ruby where y was odd was considered experimental, and an even minor version number indicated a production version. But late last year Matz announced that he was afraid of running out of digits, and that 1.9 WOULD eventually be considered production ready, and that a teeny version number >= 1 would indicate this. The version released last Christmas was, I believe, initially intended to be Ruby 1.9.1, but late in the game it was decided that it wasn't quite ready, so it became 1.9.0. As far as I know it's still the plan to come out with a stable 1.9.1 at some point, at which time the new 2.0 stream would start in parallel. -- -- Rick DeNatale My blog on Ruby http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/
RSS Feed