24 May 22:16
Re: The original Squeak release is available under APSL2.
Lord ZealoN <lordzealon <at> gmail.com>
2006-05-24 20:16:01 GMT
2006-05-24 20:16:01 GMT
I'm going to try it in my PocketPC. Good news :) 2006/5/24, Jimmie Houchin <j.squeak <at> cyberhaus.us>: > Daniel Vainsencher wrote: > > Thanks and congrats to everyone that has worked on this! > > > > I think the natural next steps are: > > 1. Finding for each method in recent Squeak, the names of all persons > > who've modified them. The history images should make this feasible. > > 2. Gathering from all contributors a statement saying "all the code I > > ever published into Squeak I relicense APSL 2.0", getting legal advice > > on how to do this right (for example, helping people not declare > > "work-for-hire"). > > 3. Making it clear what code in the image remains tainted, to encourage > > rewrites. > > > > But a quick free release would be very nice. Say, Craig, how much code > > is there in Spoon that is not covered by this new license and not > > copyright Craig Latta? > [snip Craig's original message] > > I think it would be nice for any code relicensed or published beyond > this release be license under either the new BSD or the MIT license. > That way as code is rewritten and replaced the overall licensing of > Squeak improves. I think the only code that should be APSL is the code > Apple contributes. Maybe doing a simple BSD/MIT based Squeak Public > License or some such. > > That way if we replace the IO code with Flow, etc. the licensing > improves. We replace MVC with Tweak. We replace Collections with the > Traits rewrite. etc... Then we are left with a small core of Apple APSL > code and then other community member contributions with nicer, smaller, > cleaner licenses. > > Regardless, under the APSL minimally puts Squeak into an understandable > situation by the larger programming, open source community. > > Thanks to all who worked towards this. This could definitely provide a > nice foundation for the future. > > Is this where the disassembly of the monolithic image begins? > Shrink this image. Build back up with SM code, or some such. > > My 2cents. > > Jimmie > > > -- -- ::Mi blog:: http://blog.lordzealon.com
RSS Feed