Re: The original Squeak release is available under APSL2.

Am 25.05.2006 um 00:31 schrieb tim Rowledge:

> On 24-May-06, at 3:05 PM, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
>
>> IIRC other organizations (I think it was the FSF) actually require  
>> a signed paper form for this. A wiki page isn't really legally  
>> binding, is it?
> No idea, but it surely must be as binding as whatever one has  
> already done by producing the file - why should changing something  
> implicit in electronic form need explicit paper?

Well, there is real paper, likely signed by Important People, in some  
drawer somewhere with the original, and the new license grant. And I  
guess it goes from there - the term "paper trail" must come from  
something, right?

> I should stop thinking about licensing before my tail starts steaming.

Good idea. Though I have a hunch we're not going to get around the  
Annual License Discussion this year, it's spring-time on squeak-dev,  
after all 

- Bert -