Re: The original Squeak release is available under APSL2.

> As Andreas demonstrated,  it is not obvious that you can relicense code
> you've written just because you wish to.

I did? I thought I did the precise opposite, namely demonstrating that 
there are many bits and pieces that I *can* relicense nilly-willy 
because I own them and have proof of that ownership 

Cheers,
   - Andreas

  If you were employed at the
> time of writing the code, it may (or may not) be copyright your 
> employer, and in some countries this is the case by default.
> 
> Sounds to me like gathering all the employment dates of everyone on the 
> wiki might be a bit too public, what do people think? I was just 
> starting to make a page to gather this information when the thought 
> occurred to me...
> 
> A question to the board: do you agree this would be a good time to get 
> detailed legal advice on how to go about relicensing the rest of Squeak 
> so that the move is legally valid?
> 
> Daniel
> 
> Diego Gomez Deck wrote:
>>> If someone could build a suitable page on a swiki (for example) for  
>>> this I would be very happy to declare everything I've previously  
>>> contributed as available under any relevant license or indeed, non- 
>>> license.
>>>     
>>
>> We also need to include APSL2 license in SqueakMap (and SqueakSource?).
>>
>> I'll also publish all my contributions in any license we agreed.  To
>> start I can re-license everything as "MIT/APSL2/SqueakL".
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> -- Diego
>>
>>
>>
>>   
> 
> 
>