20 Nov 13:45
Re: Re: Functional keys and squeak
From: K. K. Subramaniam <subbukk <at> gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Re: Functional keys and squeak
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.smalltalk.squeak.general
Date: 2008-11-20 12:45:50 GMT
Subject: Re: Re: Functional keys and squeak
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.smalltalk.squeak.general
Date: 2008-11-20 12:45:50 GMT
On Wednesday 19 Nov 2008 5:18:23 am Andreas Raab wrote: > > So, my question is, is squeak images aware of existance of functional > keys? > > Short answer: No. And I'll leave the long answer to someone else"Hardware is really just software crystallized early. It is there to make program schemes run as efficiently as possible. But far too often the hardware has been presented as a given and it is up to software designers to make it appear reasonable." - (1992) Alan Kay in http://www.smalltalk.org/smalltalk/TheEarlyHistoryOfSmalltalk_VI.html The functional keys are a roundabout way of creating programmable buttons. The buttons are physically embedded in hardware and logic is split between various layers in the software stack. Squeak has a much easier way of creating soft buttons, so its virtual machine does not emulate f-keys. Subbu
"Hardware is really just software crystallized early. It is there to make
program schemes run as efficiently as possible. But far too often the
hardware has been presented as a given and it is up to software designers to
make it appear reasonable." - (1992) Alan Kay in
RSS Feed