Re: [Board] Licensing term

Yoshiki Ohshima wrote:
>   Thanks, Randal,
> 
>   I knew I needed to send it to Janko to get people take it more
> seriously^^;  Janko, could you fold his suggestion?

Done! Please look at the http://www.squeak.org/SqueakLicense/ and 
confirm that I put it in correct place.

Janko

> Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
>>
>> Just a minor nit, since I wear that "techwriter" hat from time to time:
>>
>>>>>>> "Yoshiki" == Yoshiki Ohshima <yoshiki@...> writes:
>> Yoshiki>   We can only accept new
>> Yoshiki> contributions that is under the MIT license.
>>
>> Replace that with either:
>>
>>   All new contributions must be under the MIT license.
>>
>> (or)
>>
>>   We can accept new contributions only if they are under the MIT license.
>>
>> But I like the first one, because it's shorter. :)

Yoshiki Ohshima wrote:
 >   Janko,
 >
 >   Could you put a paragraph in http://squeak.org/SqueakLicense/,
 > before "Have you contributed source to Squeak?", that states:
 >
 > ---------------
 > Do you want to contribute source to Squeak?  We can only accept new
 > contributions that is under the MIT license.  When you make your code
 > available, please state explicitly in some form such as the
 > description on a web site or email announcement that your contribution
 > is under the MIT license.  (It doesn't have to be exclusive; you can
 > release it under difference licenses at the same time.)
 > ---------------
 >
 > -- Yoshiki
 >