17 Mar 16:06
Re: Investigating the effort it will take to get to Pier
From: Brad Fuller <bradallenfuller@...>
Subject: Re: Investigating the effort it will take to get to Pier
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.smalltalk.squeak.webteam
Date: 2008-03-17 15:06:39 GMT
Subject: Re: Investigating the effort it will take to get to Pier
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.smalltalk.squeak.webteam
Date: 2008-03-17 15:06:39 GMT
I don't know of anyone who has invested time to determine how much it would take to port squeak.org over to Pier. There's not a lot of content, so it could be as easy as creating a pier image and then just copy and pasting. On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 2:52 PM, Danie Roux <danie@...> wrote: > Dear Webteam, > > Has anyone here investigated/estimated the effort it would take to move to Pier? > > I would like to do that investigation and put together some sort of action plan. > > If I read the situation correctly, the biggest push for a technology > upgrade is twofold: > > - Persistence right now is not ideal. > - We need an implementation of a CAPTCHA to stop spammers from > spamming via "Contact Us". > > What did I miss? Some people suggested the look and feel should also > be considered during such an upgrade, but I don't think that is a > major driver. > > If the Pier upgrade can be done successfully and smoothly, I would > want to do an integration to http://recaptcha.net/learnmore.html to > stop the spammers. > > Next steps then: > - Has anyone looked at a Pier upgrade? > - Shall I just grab the current image, start playing with it test the > viability of an upgrade? > > -- > Danie Roux *shuffle* Adore Unix - http://danieroux.com > _______________________________________________ > Webteam mailing list > Webteam@... > http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/webteam > -- -- Brad Fuller www.bradfuller.com
RSS Feed