21 Mar 11:58
Re: the Squeak board's recommendation for the web team, 2008-03-19
From: Janko Mivšek <janko.mivsek@...>
Subject: Re: the Squeak board's recommendation for the web team, 2008-03-19
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.smalltalk.squeak.webteam
Date: 2008-03-21 10:58:27 GMT
Subject: Re: the Squeak board's recommendation for the web team, 2008-03-19
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.smalltalk.squeak.webteam
Date: 2008-03-21 10:58:27 GMT
Hi Brad, Thank you for your warm welcome! Yes, content is our main concern, that's why our "users" see and expect from us and that's what we need to provide them in a time we have and it is always short. Here comes also my idea to extend content maintenance duties to at least all teams, so that for instance a release team will be responsible to keep up-to-date the downloads section. Duty of web team will then be more a coordination and specially the new incentives to improve the website. As you said, our website is a special one and to show a real Squeak strength we need to run it on Squeak. I think we all agree to that point. What we don't yet agree is a technology to use. And as you are all aware a "competition" is going right now. Well, so far so good, both contending communities will at the end have a better product, so I currently don't see a problem on that. And because I am part of of one side I'll also try to provide the best possible solution on our technology. For you to decide later, which way to go. I think that's most fair way to go. Best regards JAnko Brad Fuller wrote: > Welcome aboard Janko! And thanks for all the work you've done showing Aida. > > The most important job is making sure content is updated in a timely > manner. There are dedicated people on the team - we just have little > time to update the content, let alone fix lengthy pages. There's lots > to do on the site to bring it up to date. But, I must say, that it's > come a long way. > > I want to state that I stand by my statement that I believe we should > continue utilizing Smalltalk as the engine to the website. (I also > want to point out that I didn't see that the SqF concluded that Aida > should be utilized. I think that's up to us.) There are lots of great > website engines that have the capabilities that would work just fine > for our needs - easy to deploy and easy keep up to date (Mambo/Joomla > comes to mind.) But, we are a special website. We represent a > community of people that believe Smalltalk, and Squeak in particular, > is a great development and deployment environment. The community's > goals are the promotion and enhancement of Squeak, among many others. > Utilizing another engine does not promote these goals, it detracts > from it. I think it's a shame that we would not use Smalltalk in this > endeavor, to show visitors as well as old-timers, that we walk the > talk. > > brad > _______________________________________________ > Webteam mailing list > Webteam@... > http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/webteam > -- -- Janko Mivšek Svetovalec za informatiko Eranova d.o.o. Ljubljana, Slovenija www.eranova.si tel: 01 514 22 55 faks: 01 514 22 56 gsm: 031 674 565
RSS Feed