2 Apr 02:10
Re: 2047 Limit for Actions
From: David Abrahams <dave <at> boost-consulting.com>
Subject: Re: 2047 Limit for Actions
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lib.boost.build
Date: 2005-04-02 00:10:17 GMT
Subject: Re: 2047 Limit for Actions
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lib.boost.build
Date: 2005-04-02 00:10:17 GMT
Nicolas Fleury <nidoizo <at> yahoo.com> writes: > David Abrahams wrote: >> Nicolas Fleury <nidoizo <at> yahoo.com> writes: >>>I must admit the trick left me perplex... I'm wondering if a simpler >>>solution, like having some way to disable the limit for a specific >>>action, even if it affects a bit its performance. >> >> Disabling the limit helps nothing AFAIK; you can use the trick anyway. >> The limit is neccessary in order to make piecemeal actions work. > > But to use the trick I still need to compile a custom boost.jam If you can do the actions on separate lines using that trick then you can also make them piecemeal actions. > , and I > would prefer to submit a patch for a more permanent (and elegant) > solution. Would that make sense to have an action modifier "unlimited" > (or whatever) that cannot be combined with "piecemeal"? Or an "unshell" > modifier that would just split the commands with " " and pass the > arguments directly to the process without using any shell? There is already such a facility. http://lists.boost.org/MailArchives/boost/msg20819.php http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.boost.build/1681 HTH, -- -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jamboost/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: jamboost-unsubscribe <at> yahoogroups.com <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
RSS Feed