Re: Egg 2nd request for reviews: Some comments

vicente.botet wrote:
>>> Could you show what a user that do not use the macros needs to write. 
>>> This
>>> will surely help to understand why these macros a necessary.
>> It was really odd.
>> Fortunately, in a recent discussion,
>> it is shown that those macros can be removed with a trivial patch.
>> A newly proposed form is:
>>
>>     egg::static_<
>>         result_of<T_pipable(T_make_filtered)>
>>     >::type const filtered = {{}};
>>
>> How do you think about this form?
> 
> Well, there are no more macros, this is much better for me..
> Sorry, I have missed the post. Could you give me the reference to this 
> discussion?

See this thread:
   http://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2008/03/135317.php

Regards,

--

-- 
Shunsuke Sogame

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost