13 Apr 00:26
Re: Egg 2nd request for reviews
From: shunsuke <pstade.mb <at> gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Egg 2nd request for reviews
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel
Date: 2008-04-12 22:26:49 GMT
Subject: Re: Egg 2nd request for reviews
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel
Date: 2008-04-12 22:26:49 GMT
Daniel Walker wrote: > Egg seems to have a lot of valuable components that may fill a niche > in the existing paradigm for functional programing in C++, but the > shape of that niche is changing as more classic boost techniques are > transmuted into the standard and newer boost libraries come online. So > there's an unfixed boundary between advancing the cause of functional > programing and reinventing existing primitives. For example, in C++03 > (and C++0x) there's a need for more flexible/powerful function > parameters. C++0x variadic functions provides for a variable number of > type-safe parameters, but what if a user wants to change their order > or name them? In other words, in either standard, when users need more > advanced function parameters, how does Egg relate to Boost.Parameter? For Egg, named parameters facility also should be a FunctionAdaptor. E.g. named(plus)(left=1, right=2); Actually old Egg had such a FunctionAdaptor. I removed it in honor of Boost.Parameter. > Another example: there's a long standing practice of currying > functions with bind, which will be standardized in C++0x. How does > Egg's curring "function adaptor" relate to std::bind? (These are just > some questions that jumped out at me on my first impression. I haven't > spent a lot of time trying to reason through the documentation.) Assume std_bind is a FunctionObject type which represents std::bind: X_lazy<std_bind> std_lazy; std_lazy(plus)(_1, 2)(1); std::bind can be a customization point of egg::lazy. IMO, bind interface is legacy. (In fact, to implement std_bind is too difficult, and bll::bind is enough. So, Egg skips it.) > FWIW, I did build and run Egg's test suite using gcc 4.3 with both > -std=c++98 and -std=c++0x. The test suite is large and seems to have > good coverage. It ran with only one apparently minor glitch, which is > testimony to the quality of Egg's implementation. Egg is certainly an > accomplishment. Shunsuke, later this weekend I'll try to send you the > test suite output and a few other comments off-list. Thanks. -- -- Shunsuke Sogame _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
RSS Feed