Re: [math] pow redux and observations

> At the cost of one additional template instantiation (power<0> will
> always be instantiated) we get rid of the second parameter and have no
> runtime evaluation, as advocated in the other thread.

Oops... I realize that this falls back to the solution initially
proposed by John Moeller and that had been rejected by Hervé due to
the multiplication by 1. Sorry 

Bruno
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost